Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Fwd: Motion P1788/M0020.01 Comparison Relations: NO



I vote NO for the same reasons:

George Corliss

Begin forwarded message:

> From: Alan Eliasen <eliasen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: October 8, 2010 2:46:35 AM CDT
> To: stds-1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Motion P1788/M0020.01 Comparison Relations: NO
> 
>   My vote on M0020.01 is NO.
> 
>   This paper is a nice piece of mathematical foundation and background
> for further discussions.  However, I do not believe that it is concrete
> enough to warrant its inclusion into the standard at this time.
> 
>   When voting "NO", we are required to state what would be required to
> vote "YES".  This is somewhat difficult in this case.  I think a more
> concrete proposal, including a specific choice of required algebraic
> operations, would be necessary.  Other competing motions currently cover
> a simple set of required binary comparisons, and may be preferred.
> 
> -- 
>  Alan Eliasen
>  eliasen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>  http://futureboy.us/

Dr. George F. Corliss
Electrical and Computer Engineering
Marquette University
P.O. Box 1881
1515 W. Wisconsin Ave
Milwaukee WI 53201-1881 USA
414-288-6599; GasDay: 288-4400; Fax 288-5579
George.Corliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
www.eng.mu.edu/corlissg