Thread Links
Date Links
Thread Prev
Thread Next
Thread Index
Date Prev
Date Next
Date Index
Re: Motion P1788/0023.01:NoMidRad -- I vote No.
To
:
stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject
: Re: Motion P1788/0023.01:NoMidRad -- I vote No.
From
: Rudnei Cunha <
rudnei.cunha@xxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 15:13:58 -0300
Delivered-to
:
mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <
AANLkTikaKfYQ-xCdgZ65UisWdHQGWAnptaKLRDOcfBpZ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
List-help
: <
http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788
>, <
mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788
>
List-owner
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
List-subscribe
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
List-unsubscribe
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
References
: <
AANLkTikaKfYQ-xCdgZ65UisWdHQGWAnptaKLRDOcfBpZ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Sender
:
stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
I vote YES on Motion 23.
I shall also say that my vote is in the interest of proceeding forward with the standard, even though I favour mid-rad instead.
Regards,
Rudnei
References
:
Re: Motion P1788/0023.01:NoMidRad -- I vote No.
From:
Lee Winter
Prev by Date:
Re: Bare decorations (was ...level 2 datums)
Next by Date:
Re: Motion P1788/0023.01:NoMidRad -- I vote No.
Previous by thread:
Re: Motion P1788/0023.01:NoMidRad -- I vote No.
Index(es):
Date
Thread