Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: Bare decorations (was ...level 2 datums)



Baker,

I can do whatever you think is best...

although I'm still probably going to need a week or two to finish writing the motion.

Nate


----- Original Message ----- From: "Ralph Baker Kearfott" <rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "Nate Hayes" <nh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "John Pryce" <j.d.pryce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; "stds-1788" <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2010 9:17 AM
Subject: Re: Bare decorations (was ...level 2 datums)


Nate,

On 10/26/2010 08:34, Nate Hayes wrote:
John Pryce wrote:
Nate
.
.
.
I'm planning to wait until Motion 22 and its Amendment has finished voting before submitting the new motion, however, since it will incorporate definitions
and concepts from Motion 22 (and its proposed amendment).


However, Motion 22 is not being voted upon at present. I thought I was awaiting
a revision from John before bringing it to a vote.  Am I mistaken?  I am
seeking a green light from someone. In particular, it might be procedurally
most efficient if you simply incorporate the definitions and concepts from
Motion 22 and its amendment into your motion, then submit it.

Sincerely,

Baker

Nate Hayes



--

---------------------------------------------------------------
R. Baker Kearfott,    rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx   (337) 482-5346 (fax)
(337) 482-5270 (work)                     (337) 993-1827 (home)
URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
(Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
---------------------------------------------------------------