Thread Links
Date Links
Thread Prev
Thread Next
Thread Index
Date Prev
Date Next
Date Index
Motion 19
To
:
stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
Subject
: Motion 19
From
: Alexandru Amaricai <
amaricai@xxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 18:53:23 +0300
Delivered-to
:
mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help
: <
http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788
>, <
mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788
>
List-owner
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
List-subscribe
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
List-unsubscribe
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
Sender
:
stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
User-agent
: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (Windows/20100228)
I vote NO. As said previously, we should stick to the KISS principle in
the development of our standard.
Alexandru Amaricai
Prev by Date:
Re: motion21
Next by Date:
Re: Motion M00019.02 Yes
Previous by thread:
Yes on motion 19.02
Next by thread:
Motion P1788/M0021.02:RevisedIntervalOverlapping discussion period begins
Index(es):
Date
Thread