Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Motion P1788/M0021.2:IntervalOverlapping: NO

To: stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Motion P1788/M0021.2:IntervalOverlapping: NO
From: vaccaro@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sun, 05 Dec 2010 22:36:30 +0100
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4CFB88E0.4080802@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
References: <4CFB88E0.4080802@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.3.9)

For this motion my vote is NO.
I fully agree with the argumentations discussed by Dan Zuras.

A.Vaccaro

----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.

References:
- Motion P1788/M0021.2:IntervalOverlapping: NO
  - From: Andreas Rauh

Prev by Date: Motion p1788/21.02 Interval overlapping vote YES
Next by Date: Motion P1788/M0021.2:IntervalOverlapping: NO
Previous by thread: Motion P1788/M0021.2:IntervalOverlapping: NO
Next by thread: Motion p1788/21.02 Interval overlapping vote YES
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread