| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Dan On 7 Dec 2010, at 19:59, Dan Zuras Intervals wrote: > This too is cause to reject the motion. > If the intent is to put something as fundamental > as comparison relations under "should", they > have no portable utility at all. > > Remember, the implementer's interpretation of > the word "shall" is "I NEED to do it" & the > word "should" is "I DON'T need to do it". Indeed. But the Kulisch comparisons of motion 13 are all "shall". John