Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: P1788 Motion M0021.22 No

To: owner-stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: P1788 Motion M0021.22 No
From: M Affan Zidan <mazidan@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 9 Dec 2010 21:07:35 +0300
Cc: stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4D00EDA8.6060100@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
References: <4D00EDA8.6060100@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx

I vote NO on Motion 21.2

On 9 December 2010 17:54, Kathy Gerber <kmg5b@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I vote NO on P1788 Motion M0021.2.

Kathy Gerber

Follow-Ups:
- P1788 Motion M0021.22 No
  - From: Michael Schulte

References:
- RE: P1788 Motion M0021.22 No
  - From: Kathy Gerber

Prev by Date: Re: P1788 Motion M0021.22 No
Next by Date: RE: P1788 Motion M0021.22 No
Previous by thread: RE: P1788 Motion M0021.22 No
Next by thread: P1788 Motion M0021.22 No
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread