Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

P1788/M0021.2: NO

To: stds-1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: P1788/M0021.2: NO
From: Christian Keil <c.keil@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 21:01:37 +0100
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx

My vote on this motion is NO.

Guillaume's reasoning pretty well describes my impression when
reading the motion.

Regards,

	Christian

Prev by Date: Re: DRAFT position paper
Next by Date: Re: DRAFT position paper
Previous by thread: DRAFT position paper
Next by thread: Motion P1788/M0021.2:IntervalOverlapping NO
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread