Re: this is how I understand John Pryce's result re decorations
Vladik and all
On 21 May 2011, at 22:29, Kreinovich, Vladik wrote:
> I think I understand, I may be wrong, but at least I seem to understand now what was not clear to me from the very beginning: how the decorations that are defined for _functions_ are somehow attached to _intervals_; see attached.
>
> <decorationsVladik.pdf>
Bravo. I've not had time to read this yet but will do ASAP. This independent work on the FTDIA is just what I requested when I circulated v03.1 in January, and I have great confidence that you will contribute to
- checking the theory is correct
- maybe making it easier to implement and more useful
- simplifying the proof
- making it more accessible to everyone.
Thanks, in advance of reading.
John