Re: As simple as it is now, I am still against motion 24.03...
On 2011-06-09 03:52:28 -0700, Dan Zuras Intervals wrote:
> So I will vote against motion 24.03 & urge others to do so
> as well.
I agree with Dan. Motions should not be on how interval arithmetic
should be implemented (internally), but on what it provides (the
behavior). Implementation details could be part of the rationale,
but not the subject of a motion.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arénaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)