Re: Neumaier-Pryce proposed decoration system (v03.2)
Dominique,
I don't quite follow. Can you clarify?
If we have the tracking results (by motion 25):
sqrt([1,4])
= sqrt(([1,4],D3)) // promote input to "best" decoration
= (sqrt([1,4]),inf(S(sqrt,[1,4]),D3))
= ([1,2],inf(D3,D3))
= ([1,2],D3)
sqrt(Empty)
= sqrt((Empty,D4)) // promote input to "best" decoration
= (sqrt(Empty),inf(S(sqrt,Empty),D4))
= (Empty,inf(D4,D4))
= (Empty,D4)
then we also have:
Empty \subset [1,4] and D4 \subset D3
or, in motion 26 terms:
Empty \subset [1,4] and ein \subset dac
so the tracking results are consistent with FTDIA.
Or were you making some other point?
Nate
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dominique Lohez" <dominique.lohez@xxxxxxx>
To: "Nate Hayes" <nh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "John Pryce" <j.d.pryce@xxxxxxxxxxxx>; "stds-1788"
<stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2011 5:06 AM
Subject: Re: Neumaier-Pryce proposed decoration system (v03.2)
Nate, John , p1788,
IMHO the most significant comparison is between decorated interval s
sqrt([1,4]) = ([1,2], saf)
sqrt(Empty)= (Empty,saf)
and we have
(Empty, saf) > ( [1,2], saf)
We only need such a comparison
Dominique
Nate Hayes a écrit :
Dominque Lohez wrote:
John, Nate,
My position is that the case ein should be merged with safe by removing
the restriction that for saf the input is not empty;
Using terms as per my last e-mail, returning D3/dac for an operation like
sqrt( Empty )
is overly-conservative, since by the containment order "ein" is a more
optimal "enclosure" of the decoration result; similarly, D3 is not the
"best" decoration by the linear quality order (D4 is).
Nate
--
Dr Dominique LOHEZ
ISEN
41, Bd Vauban
F59046 LILLE
France
Phone : +33 (0)3 20 30 40 71
Email: Dominique.Lohez@xxxxxxx