Thread Links
Date Links
Thread Prev
Thread Next
Thread Index
Date Prev
Date Next
Date Index
Re: Let's not BE NP-hard, shall we...?
To
: "N.M. Maclaren" <
nmm1@xxxxxxxxx
>
Subject
: Re: Let's not BE NP-hard, shall we...?
From
: Dan Zuras Intervals <
intervals08@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 09:49:13 -0700
Cc
:
stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
, Dan Zuras Intervals <
intervals08@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Comments
: In-reply-to "N.M. Maclaren" <
nmm1@xxxxxxxxx
> message dated "04 Aug 2011 16:09:38 +0100."
Delivered-to
:
mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <
Prayer.1.3.4.1108041609380.13558@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
List-help
: <
http://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788
>, <
mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788
>
List-owner
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
List-subscribe
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
List-unsubscribe
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
References
: <
4E36D3A6.80501@xxxxxxxxxxx
> <
4E396B36.6010107@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> <
20110803164042.08FBC12AD155@xxxxxxxxx
> <
Prayer.1.3.4.1108031926070.17864@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <
20110803193644.4CAED12AD156@xxxxxxxxx
> <
Prayer.1.3.4.1108032113180.17554@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <
20110803204043.37B2212AD165@xxxxxxxxx
> <
Prayer.1.3.4.1108032209110.26248@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <
20110804021554.D711712AD16C@xxxxxxxxx
> <
Prayer.1.3.4.1108041023040.30834@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <
20110804112512.E00FE12AD172@xxxxxxxxx
>,<
Prayer.1.3.4.1108041307060.12641@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <
4C5F914ECF9F5F4CA2DB475171D055C3B991018621@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> <
20110804134648.C898D12AD181@xxxxxxxxx
> <
Prayer.1.3.4.1108041609380.13558@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Reply-to
: Dan Zuras Intervals <
intervals08@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Sender
:
stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
I give up. You win. - Dan
References
:
Position: That the Standard for Computing with Intervals Have Only One Level 1 Requirement: Containment
From:
G. William (Bill) Walster
Do I have a second? Re: Position: That the Standard for Computing with Intervals Have Only One Level 1 Requirement: Containment
From:
Ralph Baker Kearfott
Re: Do I have a second? Re: Position: That the Standard for Computing with Intervals Have Only One Level 1 Requirement: Containment
From:
Dan Zuras Intervals
Re: Do I have a second? Re: Position: That the Standard for Computing with Intervals Have Only One Level 1 Requirement: Containment
From:
N.M. Maclaren
Re: Do I have a second? Re: Position: That the Standard for Computing with Intervals Have Only One Level 1 Requirement: Containment
From:
Dan Zuras Intervals
Re: Do I have a second? Re: Position: That the Standard for Computing with Intervals Have Only One Level 1 Requirement: Containment
From:
N.M. Maclaren
Re: Do I have a second? Re: Position: That the Standard for Computing with Intervals Have Only One Level 1 Requirement: Containment
From:
Dan Zuras Intervals
Re: Do I have a second? Re: Position: That the Standard for Computing with Intervals Have Only One Level 1 Requirement: Containment
From:
N.M. Maclaren
(Basenote drift) complex arithmetic, was Re: Do I have a second?...
From:
Dan Zuras Intervals
Re: (Basenote drift) Determinism
From:
N.M. Maclaren
Determinism is hard & not the only thing on our plate...
From:
Dan Zuras Intervals
Re: Determinism is hard & not the only thing on our plate...
From:
N.M. Maclaren
RE: Determinism is hard & not the only thing on our plate...
From:
Kreinovich, Vladik
Let's not BE NP-hard, shall we...?
From:
Dan Zuras Intervals
Re: Let's not BE NP-hard, shall we...?
From:
N.M. Maclaren
Prev by Date:
Re: Let's not BE NP-hard, shall we...?
Next by Date:
Re: Reasons (not) to vote Motion 27: NO
Previous by thread:
Re: Let's not BE NP-hard, shall we...?
Next by thread:
Re: Let's not BE NP-hard, shall we...?
Index(es):
Date
Thread