Thanks Nate! Yes, set operation was my main concern.
- Chenyi
"Nate Hayes"<nh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 8/16/2011 9:50 AM>>>
John Pryce wrote:
On 15 Aug 2011, at 14:35, Chenyi Hu wrote:
I vote no on this motion.
However, I would vote yes if the description of the motion assures that
proposed decorations will assure reliability repeatedly (i.e. on the same
and different machines the intervals contain the solution although the
intervals may not be the same exactly.)
It does assure that.
Assuming no intersection or union operations are present.
Otherwise all bets are off.