Re motion 31
John, Christian
good job
I have some minor remarks
3.2.10 You identify a box as a tuple of intervals with the Cartesian
product of
intervals , but then this set is \subseteq \R^n and should
be \subseteq
\overline{\IR^n}
the same typo is in 5.4.3
I appreciate and support your choice of elmentary functions in
particular the pow(x,y)
version , which is slighty more restricted than what I poposed in Dagstuhl.
I propose to denote the Rev function as Inv
and to drop the rational power version from table 5
Jürgen
-- - Prof. Dr. Juergen Wolff von Gudenberg o Lehrstuhl fuer Informatik
II / \ Universitaet Wuerzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Wuerzburg InfoII o
Tel.: +49 931 / 31 86602 Fax ../31 86603 / \ Uni
E-Mail:wolff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx o o Wuerzburg