Re: Siegfried's recent paper, and other matters
Alexandre
This seems a good idea to me. Will you propose this motion? I was only expressing my personal opinion in my points 1 to 4.
John Pryce
On 3 Jan 2012, at 06:11, Alexandre Goldsztejn wrote:
> Dear all,
>> Ok. I will write the text for this appendix. Svetoslav has agreed to help.
>> If anyone else wishes to contribute, please contact one of us offline.
>>
>> I will also make a commitment to providing a C++ modal interval reference
>> implementation to accompany the appendix.
>
> Before Nate and others spend so much time writing these documents and
> implementations, shouldn't someone propose a motion to include Kaucher
> intervals in an appendix of the standard?
>
> Personally, I don't agree with points 3 (the standard should be as
> much as possible compatible with Kaucher intervals) and 4 (an appendix
> of the standard should be included in the standard) of John about
> Kaucher intervals, a motion could be the opportunity to discuss them.