Re: Constructors motion
On 2011-12-29 12:44:03 -0800, Dan Zuras Intervals wrote:
> OK, let's decide NOW whether or not we want Kauchers
> to be part of the standard, extension or not.
I don't think it should be in the standard, or having a standard will
take much more time. Perhaps in a revision or a second standard?
But in such a case, the spec shouldn't preclude other forms of
non-standard intervals by being too restrictive on some "undefined"
cases.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / Arénaire project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)