Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
On 01/12/2012 11:45 AM, N.M. Maclaren wrote:
On Jan 12 2012, Arnold Neumaier wrote:On 01/12/2012 09:56 AM, N.M. Maclaren wrote:On Jan 12 2012, Jean-Pierre Merlet wrote:What we are doing in that case in ALIAS for system solving is to choose a random number in the unbounded interval and to bisect the interval at that point (for bounded intervals we have tried methods to determine a bisection point that may be better than the mid-point but have found none that were better on a significant number of examples of our benchmarks, hence we are using the mid-point). ...Something that might interest people is that, subject to reasonable constraints, using random points is within a constant factor of optimal even for bounded intervals. I suspect that you already know that :-)According to which measure of optimality?Performance, accuracy, what you will.
I haven't seen anything like this in the context of branch and bound.Can you point to a reference? Maybe you refer to bisection for finding a univariate zero?
The only thing that you are sacrificing is deterministic measures of those in favour of with probability one. Most computer scientists seem to think that is a major theoretical or practical issue, but that's because they don't understand probability.