RE: Motion 31 draft text V04.4
Excellent idea, thanks for noticing.
-----Original Message-----
From: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx [mailto:stds-1788@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Vincent Lefevre
Sent: Friday, February 17, 2012 8:47 AM
To: stds-1788
Subject: Re: Motion 31 draft text V04.4
Comment on 20120215RevisedLevel1textV4.4Sent.pdf:
I think that "non-computable in finite precision" is ambiguous as it
seems related to computability. Shouldn't "non-representable [...]"
be better?
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)