Re: Table 4 proposal version 0.1...
On 2012-02-29 16:55:58 +0100, Arnold Neumaier wrote:
[...]
> However, if there is a split routine in the standard, I'd prefer to get the
> splitting point. For
>
> (i) I might want to modify the standardized splitting point (for the reasons
> given above) before using it for splitting, and
>
> (ii) in a tree-based branch-and bound structure, it saves memory to store
> just the splitting point rather than both intervals. (But of course, one can
> retrieve the splitting point from the intervals as easily as create the
> intervals from the splitting point.)
OK.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)