Re: well-order vs total-order
> Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 00:21:36 -0500
> To: Dan Zuras <intervals08@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> From: Michel Hack <hack@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: well-order vs total-order
>
> I was bitching about the choice of words. "well order" has a precise
> mathematical definition which does not match what you are describing.
>
> I understand the weak-ordering property you are describing.
>
> Michel.
> ---Sent: 2012-03-09 05:24:11 UTC
Oh, did I say well ordered?
I meant to say weakly ordered.
Sorry.
Dan