Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: P1788: M0030.01:Level_1_constructors

To: stds-1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: P1788: M0030.01:Level_1_constructors
From: Michel Hack <mhack@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2012 10:31:10 -0400
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx

Dmitry Nadezhin <dmitry.nadezhin@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Should int2interval(x) be mentioned at level 1 ?

Excellent idea!

Michel.
---Sent: 2012-03-20 14:33:07 UTC

Prev by Date: RE: Another proposal for a "split" function to complement "mid"
Next by Date: Re: Motion P1788/M0032.01:MidpointMeaning -- discussion period begins
Previous by thread: Re: P1788: M0030.01:Level_1_constructors
Next by thread: YES: P1788/M0030.01:Level_1_constructors
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread