Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
P-1788, Yes, indeed, let's use the latest version. Do I have a formal second? Baker On 04/13/2012 10:52 AM, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
On 2012-04-13 08:59:41 -0500, Ralph Baker Kearfott wrote:P-1788, The appended motion has been made by Vincent Lefevre, and has been lauded (but not formally seconded) by John Pryce; informal discussion has already begun. John (or anyone else), do you wish to formally second the motion, so the clock starts ticking on the discussion period, and so we may enter it on our web site?It may be better to use the latest version, which takes some comments into account: Date: Fri, 13 Apr 2012 13:46:43 +0200 From: Vincent Lefevre<vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> To: stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Motion: Number format (Motion 33?)
-- --------------------------------------------------------------- Ralph Baker Kearfott, rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (337) 482-5346 (fax) (337) 482-5270 (work) (337) 993-1827 (home) URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette (Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street) Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA ---------------------------------------------------------------