Re: int2interval, frac2interval, rat2interval - signed integer zeros
On 2012-04-22 10:46:09 +0100, N.M. Maclaren wrote:
> On Apr 22 2012, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> >On 2012-04-20 16:11:45 -0400, Ian McIntosh wrote:
> >
> >However in a math expression, it is not possible to differentiate
> >these two zero representations, and for P1788 they would be regarded
> >as a single zero.
> >
> >And it didn't have signed infinities in the integer types (let's
> >recall that Nick suggested signed zeros for signed infinities).
>
> Er, no, I didn't. I am not sure which remark you are referring to.
Your message from 20 Apr 2012 16:15:20 +0100. Otherwise I'm not
sure what you meant.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)
- References:
- Re: int2interval, frac2interval, rat2interval
- Re: int2interval, frac2interval, rat2interval
- Re: int2interval, frac2interval, rat2interval
- Re: int2interval, frac2interval, rat2interval
- Re: int2interval, frac2interval, rat2interval
- Re: int2interval, frac2interval, rat2interval
- Re: int2interval, frac2interval, rat2interval
- Re: int2interval, frac2interval, rat2interval - signed integer zeros
- Re: int2interval, frac2interval, rat2interval - signed integer zeros
- Re: int2interval, frac2interval, rat2interval - signed integer zeros