| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
P1788, Yes, I think Motion 35 is the point at which we decide a) P1788 is about traditional intervals only OR b) P1788 includes multiple flavors A vote FOR Motion 35 seems clearly endorsing b) A vote NO on Motion 35 requires a "What would it take to get me to vote YES" to be unambiguous. George Corliss George.Corliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx On Jun 30, 2012, at 7:49 AM, Jürgen Wolff von Gudenberg wrote: > John, P1788 > It is indeed an interesting task to analyze the relations of various interval flavors, how they include each other, define commonly many operations but also show contradictions in others. > This discussion should not be performed under the framework of P1788, because firsty we do not have the time and secondly > I see the danger that every system of interval arithmetic claims to be 1788 conforming, at least as a special flavor. > I think P1788 will only be accepted if it is presented by a clear and unique formulation of level 1 and a mapping to machine intervals in level 2 > furthermore a simple and reproducible specificaton of operations in level 3 will enhance the dissemination > > Juergen > -- > o Prof. Dr. Juergen Wolff von Gudenberg, Lehrstuhl fuer Informatik II > / \ Universitaet Wuerzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Wuerzburg > InfoII o Tel.: +49 931 / 31 86602 > / \ Uni E-Mail: wolff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > o o Wuerzburg
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail