| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
Am 20.06.2012 07:49, schrieb John Pryce:
I'm not very happy with the name "set-based" intervals, but calling them "standard" intervals is no longer appropriate, as well as clashing with the main meaning we give to "standard" (as a noun and also an adjective). Any better name welcomed. Regards John Pryce
I see two kinds of set-based intervals, the closed and bounded intervals of IR and the closed intervals of \overline{IR}. What about calling the first cb-intervals and the second c-intervals.
Kaucher or modal intervals are not really intervals. They are abstract entities. Why not calling them i-intervals for inverse or improper intervals or m-intervals.
Best regards Ulrich -- Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) Institut für Angewandte und Numerische Mathematik D-76128 Karlsruhe, Germany Prof. Ulrich Kulisch Telefon: +49 721 608-42680 Fax: +49 721 608-46679 E-Mail: ulrich.kulisch@xxxxxxx www.kit.edu www.math.kit.edu/ianm2/~kulisch/ KIT - Universität des Landes Baden-Württemberg und nationales Großforschungszentrum in der Helmholtz-Gesellschaft