Motion P1788/M0036.03: YES
I vote yes.
Rationale:
Besides this motion, P1788 seems to me not to be on track for a progressive
standard, but rather a track that will make Kaucher/modal arithmetic
non-conforming. To include Kaucher/modal intervals at a later time would
then require invalidating the future 1788 standard, which is unlikely. So
the precedent would be set for competing standards, and intervallers in both
industry and academia will be developing incompatible interval applications.
Some people have suggested they fear running out of time if considering the
possibility of this motion, but in my view the aforementioned outcome would
be a much bigger failure.
Nate Hayes
Sunfish Studio, LLC