I vote NO on motion 36.03...

[Dan Zuras Intervals <intervals08@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

	Folks,

	I vote NO on this motion.
	
	My reasons are largely along the lines of Ulrich's
	arguments, although from a different perspective.

	We are voting on THIS standard not some future one
	that might come to exist if it can be made of those
	who can agree more than we.  After all, WE are the
	experts & would also be on that committee.

	If this motion should fail, please take that as
	increased pressure to agree on some sort of Kaucher
	or modal proposal.  If not, don't worry about it.
	Including such intervals at any time invalidates
	nothing about this standard.

	While John has created an excellent framework to
	discuss things such as "flavors", that discussion
	is something we should have now not at some future
	time.  His work is not wasted no matter how this
	motion goes.

	Let's take advantage of that.

	If we can...


				Dan