Thread Links
Date Links
Thread Prev
Thread Next
Thread Index
Date Prev
Date Next
Date Index
Motion P1788/M0036.03:Flavors
To
: <
stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Subject
: Motion P1788/M0036.03:Flavors
From
:
skalna@xxxxxxxxxx
Date
: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 23:10:25 +0200
Delivered-to
:
mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help
: <
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788
>, <
mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788
>
List-owner
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
List-subscribe
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
List-unsubscribe
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
Sender
:
stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
User-agent
: Roundcube Webmail/0.7.2
My vote on Motion 36.03 is NO for the same reasons as Prof. Gudenberg
and others.
Best regards, Iwona Skalna
Prev by Date:
Re: M0036.03 Flavors and standard invalidation
Next by Date:
Re: M0036.03 Flavors and standard invalidation
Previous by thread:
P1788 draft chapter "Introduction" with flavors
Next by thread:
Motion P1788/M0036.03:Flavors
Index(es):
Date
Thread