Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Motion 36.03: NO

To: "stds-1788@xxxxxxxx" <stds-1788@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Motion 36.03: NO
From: "Chenyi Hu" <chu@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 09:13:33 -0500
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <1FDF619D2F898D4690A3BDA33025B8402F0B4FB0@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com>
List-help: <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
References: <1FDF619D2F898D4690A3BDA33025B8402F0B4FB0@ORSMSX101.amr.corp.intel.com>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx

My vote on Motion 36.03 is NO. However, it could be an appropriate appendix item.

>>> "Hanek, Bob" <bob.hanek@xxxxxxxxx> 9/7/2012 8:57 AM >>>

My vote on Motion 36.03 is NO for the same reasons as Prof. Dr. Wolff

von Gudenberg and others.

References:
- Motion 36.03: NO
  - From: Hanek, Bob

Prev by Date: P1788: Motion 36.03: NO
Next by Date: Motion 36.03: NO
Previous by thread: Motion 36.03: NO
Next by thread: Motion 36.03: NO
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread