Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: [P-1788]: Re objective == infinity



The confusion might be the distinction between
closed sets and compact sets.  I didn't see
any inconsistencies between my analysis and
topology courses, but I probably didn't go
to the same school or use the same reference
material as you.

Baker

On 09/30/2012 09:48 AM, N.M. Maclaren wrote:
On Sep 30 2012, Arnold Neumaier wrote:

The conventions about closed intervals are very standard, and don't vary with the field. This stuff is taught to all math students in the first semester.

I was taught different ones in analysis and topology, and it is probably
still done in some places.  Even if not, conventions change over time,
and I don't care which I use as long as I know which it is.

One of the things I learnt fairly early in my career is that virtually
NO convention is invariant across all areas and across periods of many
decades, but I do have a rather wider range of experience than most
people.  But there is a consequential point, the failure of which used
to send me up the wall (and occasionally still does):

PLEASE, when writing papers or documents to be read by people from very
different areas or over a long period, either define terms or provide
references to their definition.


Regards,
Nick Maclaren.



--

---------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph Baker Kearfott,   rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx   (337) 482-5346 (fax)
(337) 482-5270 (work)                     (337) 993-1827 (home)
URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
(Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
---------------------------------------------------------------