Thread Links
Date Links
Thread Prev
Thread Next
Thread Index
Date Prev
Date Next
Date Index
Motion P1788/M0037.01 - YES
To
: stds-1788 <
stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Subject
: Motion P1788/M0037.01 - YES
From
: Werner Hofschuster <
werner.hofschuster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Mon, 29 Oct 2012 12:43:45 +0100
Delivered-to
:
mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help
: <
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788
>, <
mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788
>
List-owner
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
List-subscribe
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
List-unsubscribe
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
Sender
:
stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
User-agent
: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:16.0) Gecko/20121010 Thunderbird/16.0.1
My vote on Motion P1788/M0037.01 is yes. Best regards, Werner Hofschuster
Prev by Date:
Re: Vincent's 5 Oct rad(xx) proof
Next by Date:
Motion P1788/M0037.01: YES
Previous by thread:
P1788: All intervals are thick?
Next by thread:
Motion P1788/M0037.01: NO
Index(es):
Date
Thread