Comments on Motion 42 (not 41): Decoration system, revised text
Continuing with 20121221DecoSystemCirculatedB.pdf:
8.8.1: I like the new quality-order description (following table 14)
8.8.6, Note on FTDIA on page 35: "Briefly, (29) gives..."
Is that a typo for "(19)", or should it say "(19), or (29) below, "?
8.8.7, last sentence, allowing intersectionDec() and convexHullDec() to be
a language's (or implementation's, I presume) default: Should there
not then be a requirement to provide (in the documentation) a warning
about possible mis-application that might lead to FTDIA violations?
Question at the end of 8.8 (last page):
It seems to me that the natural way to define ANY function or operation
on compressed intervals that are a decoration dx is to perform it as if
it were applied to normalInterval(dx).
Michel.
---Sent: 2012-12-21 18:23:50 UTC