Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Comments on Motion 42 (not 41): Decoration system, revised text



Continuing with 20121221DecoSystemCirculatedB.pdf:

8.8.1:  I like the new quality-order description (following table 14)

8.8.6, Note on FTDIA on page 35:  "Briefly, (29) gives..."

     Is that a typo for "(19)", or should it say "(19), or (29) below, "?

8.8.7, last sentence, allowing intersectionDec() and convexHullDec() to be
     a language's (or implementation's, I presume) default:  Should there
     not then be a requirement to provide (in the documentation) a warning
     about possible mis-application that might lead to FTDIA violations?

Question at the end of 8.8 (last page):

     It seems to me that the natural way to define ANY function or operation
     on compressed intervals that are a decoration dx is to perform it as if
     it were applied to normalInterval(dx).


Michel.
---Sent: 2012-12-21 18:23:50 UTC