Fwd: Motions M0040 and M0041: YES and NO
P1788,
Below was Nate's comment on Motion 41:
Begin forwarded message:
> From: "Nathan T. Hayes" <nh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: FW: Motions M0040 and M0041: YES and NO
> Date: January 26, 2013 8:32:03 AM CST
> To: "Corliss, George" <george.corliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reply-To: <nh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hi George,
>
> FYI, below was my comment on Motion 41.
>
> Nate
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nathan T. Hayes [mailto:nh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2013 9:52 AM
> To: stds-1788 (stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
> Subject: Motions M0040 and M0041: YES and NO
>
> I vote yes on Motion 40 and no on Motion 41.
>
> I would vote yes to Motion 41 if it says the standard should strictly extend
> classical IA to the set of nonempty, closed intervals; such that Empty is
> still a mathematical object of the standard but is not an interval.
>
> Nate
>
>