Re: Motion M0041 NO
On 2013-01-26 22:08:53 +0000, John Pryce wrote:
> On 24 Jan 2013, at 15:40, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> > I vote NO on Motion 41.
>
> I take note of Vincent's reasons for voting NO. I think I agree with
> them all (but don't want to make long explanations about, e.g., the
> 17 byte problem), and if they had been pointed out before the vote
> started I would happily have accepted them as friendly amendments.
Sorry, exceptionally I was off for 3 weeks with not much time
for work, then I had a tight deadline to finish some paper.
It will take me at least a few days to catch up with the usual
things. I hope there won't be many problems with Motion 42.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)