Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: I'm a bit lost Re: Meaning of decorations

To: "'stds-1788'" <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: I'm a bit lost Re: Meaning of decorations
From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 02:31:32 +0100
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <53CC92BBCAE24E1384FA3155DFA873C4@smrsenyo>
List-help: <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Mail-followup-to: 'stds-1788' <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <000101cdf115$811f93f0$835ebbd0$@sunfishstudio.com> <50F2F9F0.8020407@lusfiber.net> <50F30955.1060706@eecs.berkeley.edu> <53CC92BBCAE24E1384FA3155DFA873C4@smrsenyo>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21-6295-vl-r57845 (2013-01-31)

On 2013-01-14 09:30:04 +0100, Siegfried M. Rump wrote:
> I agree: a reference implementation for ALL features is most useful and
> necessary, if not mandatory.

I also agree.

-- 
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)

References:
- Meaning of decorations
  - From: Nathan T. Hayes
- I'm a bit lost Re: Meaning of decorations
  - From: Ralph Baker Kearfott
- Re: I'm a bit lost Re: Meaning of decorations
  - From: Richard Fateman
- Re: I'm a bit lost Re: Meaning of decorations
  - From: Siegfried M. Rump

Prev by Date: Re: Motion 42: NO
Next by Date: P1788: PLEASE VOTE: Motion 42
Previous by thread: Re: I'm a bit lost Re: Meaning of decorations
Next by thread: Re: I'm a bit lost Re: Meaning of decorations
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread