Re: text2interval again /
On 2013-03-09 18:55:40 -0600, Ralph Baker Kearfott wrote:
> Ah, yes. That is understood. However, doesn't
> 752-2008 specify that, if a recommended function is
> supplied, it shall have certain properties for it
> to be standard-conforming?
if a function is supplied as part of the IEEE 754-2008 implementation.
A C implementation may say that it conforms to IEEE 754-2008 without
any of the recommended functions. The sin() function would still be
provided by the C implementation, as a requirement from the ISO C
standard, but it wouldn't be part of the IEEE 754-2008 implementation.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)