Thread Links Date Links
Thread Prev Thread Next Thread Index Date Prev Date Next Date Index

Re: Motion P1788/M0043.01Div2Pair change to YES

P1788

On 2 May 2013, at 16:09, J. Wolff von Gudenberg wrote:
>  I do not think that the 3 argument mulRefPair is necessary.
> hence, I support your option OPT1.  I could also live with OPT2
> But I'm not wiling to spend more time on this motion. The next round
> IMHO should be a final text voting.

No one has spoken up for anything different, so I take it that the motion chooses OPT1 (no 3 argument version), and change my vote to YES on that basis.

John Pryce