Re: motion 44
Juergen,
For some reason, the web site is down at the moment. I will
answer as soon as it is back up and I can review the motion.
John and I are planning on discussing and clarifying the
order in which the remainder of the actual standards text is
to be brought to vote in the very near future.
Best regards,
Baker
On 05/10/2013 08:46 AM, J. Wolff von Gudenberg wrote:
Baker
did you notice that motion 44 is pending. discussion should have ended on April 30. perhaps it is still unclear wht I meant with this motion:
well, I'm not a specialist in Robert's rules but
I think that all parts f the final text must be accepted by a vote. Since we explicitly excluded consructors, we have to vote again, although there are no major changes.
The same statement holds for decorations where I would launch a similar motion very soon
regards Jürgen
--
- Prof. Dr. Juergen Wolff von Gudenberg
o Lehrstuhl fuer Informatik II
/ \ Universitaet Wuerzburg, Am Hubland, D-97074 Wuerzburg
InfoII o Tel.: +49 931 / 31 86602 Fax ../31 86603
/ \ Uni E-Mail:wolff@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
o o Wuerzburg
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph Baker Kearfott, rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (337) 482-5346 (fax)
(337) 482-5270 (work) (337) 993-1827 (home)
URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
(Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
---------------------------------------------------------------