Process amendments by consensus? Re: P1788: Motion 44 Constructors PASSES
George, P-1788,
Thank you. We will complete processing of the motion to
amend after your summary. However, since the changes don't
appear to be controversial, I propose we process them by
consensus (indicating in the record, i.e. on the web list
of motions, that it was processed this way). That is,
if we have no objections in 3 days, we consider the
motion to have passed, but we revisit it if we receive
an objection.
Are there any objections to this procedure for processing the
changes to Motion 44?
Baker
On 06/03/2013 07:36 AM, Corliss, George wrote:
P1788,
Motion 44 Constructors PASSES
Yes - 37; No - 4; required for quorum: 31
According to our Policies and Procedures, a vote of "No" on standard text is considered as a motion to amend. I will be summarizing the points of the 4 "No" votes within a day or two.
Thank you to all voters.
George Corliss,
P1788 Voting Tabulator
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Ralph Baker Kearfott, rbk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (337) 482-5346 (fax)
(337) 482-5270 (work) (337) 993-1827 (home)
URL: http://interval.louisiana.edu/kearfott.html
Department of Mathematics, University of Louisiana at Lafayette
(Room 217 Maxim D. Doucet Hall, 1403 Johnston Street)
Box 4-1010, Lafayette, LA 70504-1010, USA
---------------------------------------------------------------