Re: P1788: Motion 44 NO votes
On 2013-06-06 06:04:22 +0100, John Pryce wrote:
> However as a result of discussion I also avoid "is not defined" &
> "is undefined" because people said it could be interpreted as
> standardese for "is left undefined by this standard so the
> implementation may do what it likes". Instead I say "has no value";
> I put something in the Definitions about this.
I agree. Draft 7.2 is fine on this point.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)