Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

A thought on implementation of literal functions, if they are accepted

To: stds-1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: A thought on implementation of literal functions, if they are accepted
From: Michel Hack <mhack@xxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2013 11:10:00 -0400
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <51C1C477.8020107@louisiana.edu>
List-help: <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
References: <51C1C477.8020107@louisiana.edu>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx

Baker Kearfott wrote:
> (In the Netlib listing, there is also the following link:
>    http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~jhauser/arithmetic/softfloat.html
> to a software implementation of the IEEE floating point standard.)

That link has restricted access, but Google "jhauser arithmetic"
finds www.jhauser.us/arithmetic/SoftFloat.html which has the info.

Michel.

---Sent: 2013-06-19 15:12:19 UTC

Follow-Ups:
- Re: A thought on implementation of literal functions, if they are accepted
  - From: John Pryce

References:
- A thought on implementation of literal functions, if they are accepted
  - From: Ralph Baker Kearfott

Prev by Date: agenda for our annual meeting
Next by Date: A thought on implementation of literal functions, if they are accepted
Previous by thread: A thought on implementation of literal functions, if they are accepted
Next by thread: Re: A thought on implementation of literal functions, if they are accepted
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread