Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Motion 45. Exact Dot Product Revision & Motion 46. Interval literals Yes Yes

To: <stds-1788@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Motion 45. Exact Dot Product Revision & Motion 46. Interval literals Yes Yes
From: "Jose Antonio" <naramuno@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 21:54:57 +0200
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
Thread-index: Ac6EuTFq6IswVx1TSeiG1181ovGm8Q==

I vote Yes for both motions.

José Antonio Muñoz

CIO

INERGETIA S.L
T: 954 37 14 43
M: 627 93 00 89

@: joseamunoz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
D.P: C/ Guadiana 17-3º
41002-Sevilla

Web: www.inergetia.com

Prev by Date: Re: P1788 input/output
Next by Date: Re: Motion 46 -- Vincent's objections
Previous by thread: Motion 46: NO
Next by thread: Re: Discussion of interval literal syntax
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread