Re: Motion 46 -- Vincent's objections
On 2013-07-21 06:58:19 +0100, John Pryce wrote:
> All this seems a good reason to say that 1788 assumes the default
> locale; also that as 754§5.12 says, "Issues of character codes
> (ASCII, Unicode, etc.) are not defined by this standard".
BOM (Byte Order Mark) is not related to the locale. But since it can
affect anything where automatic parsing is done, it is probably out
of the scope of this standard.
--
Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)