Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Motion on I/O clause: a note

To: stds-1788 <stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Motion on I/O clause: a note
From: John Pryce <j.d.pryce@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 13:43:50 +0100
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
List-help: <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx

I should have pointed out that the I/O motion of my earlier email today is only meaningful if Motion 46 passes. Voting ends tomorrow Mon 28 July, so PLEASE VOTE.
John Pryce

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Motion on I/O clause: a note
  - From: Corliss, George

Prev by Date: Re: Motion on I/O clause: a note
Next by Date: Motion on I/O clause
Previous by thread: Motion on I/O clause
Next by thread: Re: Motion on I/O clause: a note
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread