Thread Links			Date Links
Thread Prev	Thread Next	Thread Index	Date Prev	Date Next	Date Index

Re: P1788: Motions 45 - YES

To: stds-1788 <STDS-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: P1788: Motions 45 - YES
From: Christian Keil <c.keil@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2013 20:40:13 +0200
Delivered-to: mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <36DF0430-C458-4743-9786-AE18C57A91A1@Marquette.edu>
List-help: <https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788>, <mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788>
List-owner: <mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-subscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG>
References: <36DF0430-C458-4743-9786-AE18C57A91A1@Marquette.edu>
Sender: stds-1788@xxxxxxxx

My vote on Motion 45: Exact Dot Product Revision is YES.

Cheers,

	Christian

References:
- P1788: Motions 45 & 46 - Please vote
  - From: Corliss, George

Prev by Date: Motion 45: YES
Next by Date: Re:Motion 45 - yes
Previous by thread: P1788: Motion 46 - YES
Next by thread: P1788: Motions 45 & 46 - Please vote
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread