| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
Am 05.09.2013 13:59, schrieb Ralph
Baker Kearfott:
Baker,Can someone please clarify or confirm to me how we view the EDP? In particular, the only practical difference I see between the EDP and a correctly rounded dot product (the present state of P-1788's plan) is that a possible EDP operation must return some representation of the exact result (not a standard floating point number), whereas the correctly rounded dot product must return a floating point number the same AS IF the dot product were first computed exactly, then rounded according to the rounding mode in effect. Thus, if my interpretation is right, the only additional requirement of the EDP over the correctly rounded DP is that a representation from which the exact result can be recovered be available. Wouldn't whether or not that result is subsequently rounded into a floating point number then be up to the programmer or user? Baker
A := 0; The last
statement then rounds the value of type complete (to
nearest, upward, downward,
or to the least including interval depending on the
rounding symbol o) to the
type of z. Here z could be of any higher precision. For example
the method of defect correction requires highly accurate
computation of
expressions of the form -- Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT) Institut für Angewandte und Numerische Mathematik D-76128 Karlsruhe, Germany Prof. Ulrich Kulisch Telefon: +49 721 608-42680 Fax: +49 721 608-46679 E-Mail: ulrich.kulisch@xxxxxxx www.kit.edu www.math.kit.edu/ianm2/~kulisch/ KIT - Universität des Landes Baden-Württemberg und nationales Großforschungszentrum in der Helmholtz-Gesellschaft |