| Thread Links | Date Links | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thread Prev | Thread Next | Thread Index | Date Prev | Date Next | Date Index |
|
This is motion 50 in the
http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/1788/private/Motions/AllMotions.html As I understand it .. A motion (47) to require both EDP and CA failed. 6 Yes, 30 No. This motion (50) requires EDP but recommends CA. I think that many of the arguments already presented in motion 47 are relevant even if CA is merely recommended. I repeat just one of them. Regardless of the possible arguments for or against EDP as a computational tool, adding a functionality which has neither interval inputs nor interval outputs and appears to require a data object (extended accumulator) not otherwise present in the standard, seems gratuitous in the context of an interval standard. So I vote No. |