Re: Motion P1788/M0050:EDP-Without-CA: voting period begins

["Corliss, George" <george.corliss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I agree.  NO.

George Corliss


On Sep 15, 2013, at 12:02 PM, Vincent Lefevre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx>
 wrote:

> I vote NO on Motion P1788/M0050:EDP-Without-CA.
> 
> Same reason as what Richard Fateman said.
> 
> I also disagree on requiring a complex operation such as EDP while
> simpler exact operations such as an exact sum or an exact product
> of two numbers aren't even mentioned. Something like that is seen
> nowhere in other standards. EDP and other exact operations have
> their place only in their own standard.
> 
> -- 
> Vincent Lefèvre <vincent@xxxxxxxxxx> - Web: <http://www.vinc17.net/>
> 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <http://www.vinc17.net/blog/>
> Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon)

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail