Thread Links
Date Links
Thread Prev
Thread Next
Thread Index
Date Prev
Date Next
Date Index
Re: Motions 48 and 49 - Yes
To
:
owner-stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject
: Re: Motions 48 and 49 - Yes
From
: Alexandru Amaricai <
amaricai@xxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 07:23:02 +0300
Cc
: stds-1788 <
stds-1788@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
Delivered-to
:
mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <
523576B6.1040809@uni-rostock.de
>
List-help
: <
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788
>, <
mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788
>
List-owner
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
List-subscribe
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
List-unsubscribe
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
References
: <
523576B6.1040809@uni-rostock.de
>
Sender
:
stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
User-agent
: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130801 Thunderbird/17.0.8
I also vote YES on both motions. Alexandru Amaricai
Follow-Ups
:
Motions 48 and 49 - Yes
From:
vaccaro
References
:
Motions 48 and 49 - Yes
From:
Günter Mayer
Prev by Date:
Motions 48 and 49 - Yes
Next by Date:
Re: Information / computing polynomial without EDP or CA
Previous by thread:
Motions 48 and 49 - Yes
Next by thread:
Motions 48 and 49 - Yes
Index(es):
Date
Thread