Thread Links
Date Links
Thread Prev
Thread Next
Thread Index
Date Prev
Date Next
Date Index
Re: P1788: PLEASE VOTE on M0048 & 49
To
: IEEEP1788a <
stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
>
Subject
: Re: P1788: PLEASE VOTE on M0048 & 49
From
: Ned Nedialkov <
nedialk@xxxxxxxxxxx
>
Date
: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 15:21:52 -0400
Delivered-to
:
mhonarc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to
: <
5235730C.90402@math.uni-wuppertal.de
>
List-help
: <
https://listserv.ieee.org/cgi-bin/wa?LIST=STDS-1788
>, <
mailto:LISTSERV@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG?body=INFO%20STDS-1788
>
List-owner
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
List-subscribe
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-subscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
List-unsubscribe
: <
mailto:STDS-1788-unsubscribe-request@LISTSERV.IEEE.ORG
>
References
: <
521D10ED.2080206@louisiana.edu
> <
8E315E35-915D-4122-AA7D-89E61B49553B@Marquette.edu
> <
5235730C.90402@math.uni-wuppertal.de
>
Sender
:
stds-1788@xxxxxxxx
I vote YES on both motions 48 and 49. Ned Nedialkov
References
:
Motion P1788/M0048:IO-Clause --voting period begins
From:
Ralph Baker Kearfott
P1788: PLEASE VOTE on M0048 & 49
From:
Corliss, George
Re: P1788: PLEASE VOTE on M0048 & 49
From:
Walter Kraemer
Prev by Date:
Motion P1788/M0049:FunctionAccuracy
Next by Date:
Re: Motion P1788/M0050:EDP-Without-CA: NO
Previous by thread:
Re: P1788: PLEASE VOTE on M0048 & 49
Next by thread:
Motion P1788/M0048:IO-Clause -- YES
Index(es):
Date
Thread